Elijah Mwangi, the Principal Secretary for Mining, is facing growing criticism over the alleged irregular transfer of 500 acres of public land in Taita Taveta to the Devki Group.
The land is earmarked for the construction of a steel factory, but critics have raised concerns about the lack of transparency and absence of public participation in the transaction.
Activist Akal Simba has been vocal in questioning the legitimacy of the land transfer, pointing to the absence of a gazette notice and inadequate involvement of local communities.
Simba, who has taken to social media to expose what he views as the mismanagement of Kenya’s mineral resources, claims he has faced threats and harassment for his efforts.
His advocacy highlights the risks faced by individuals who challenge powerful figures and institutions.
The Devki Group, one of Kenya’s largest industrial conglomerates, plans to invest KSh 10.3 billion in the steel plant, a project that promises to bring economic benefits to the region.
Proponents of the initiative, including Taita Taveta Governor Andrew Mwadime, have emphasized its potential to create jobs, improve infrastructure, and spur economic growth.
However, these promises are now overshadowed by allegations of procedural flaws and the perception that the process favors corporate interests over community welfare.
The accusations against Mwangi come as no surprise to some, as his role in facilitating large-scale mining and industrial projects has previously sparked debate.
For example, a cement factory project in West Pokot, which he was involved in, also faced questions about equitable benefit distribution and community engagement.
Such patterns have led to broader concerns about how Kenya’s natural resources are managed and whether local populations are adequately compensated.
This case reflects the ongoing tension between attracting private investment for economic development and ensuring accountability in resource allocation.
Critics argue that without adherence to due process and meaningful public involvement, such projects risk alienating the very communities they are supposed to uplift.
Activists and community leaders are now calling for the revocation of the land title deed and increased oversight of the Ministry of Mining to prevent similar controversies in the future.
