CS Muturi, who has recently been under public limelight, has addressed growing concerns about his prolonged absence from office.
This follows his explosive claims about alleged government involvement in abductions and the personal tragedy of his son’s abduction last year.
The controversy has drawn attention to his actions and leadership as the Cabinet Secretary for Public Service.
However, Muturi has now offered an explanation for his absence, aiming to dispel the negative narratives surrounding him.
Speaking on the matter, Muturi clarified that his physical presence in the office is not a requirement for him to perform his duties effectively.
As quoted by Nation Africa, he dismissed critics who argue that his absence has affected the operations of his ministry.
He challenged his detractors to identify any stalled tasks or unattended documents in his office as proof of their claims.
Muturi maintained that all his responsibilities are being handled efficiently, regardless of his physical location.
This response is a direct attempt to assure the public that his absence does not equate to neglect of duty.
Muturi further explained that his remote working style is not new. He revealed that he adopted similar practices during his tenure as Attorney General, underscoring that his role is not confined to office work.
According to the CS, his position involves significant fieldwork and other engagements critical to the ministry’s goals.
By reiterating this point, Muturi sought to emphasize that his approach is deliberate and consistent with the demands of his job.
The CS’s statements come at a time when his ministry has been under pressure to demonstrate accountability and transparency.
His claims about government involvement in abductions have only heightened public interest in his activities, with critics questioning whether his absence is linked to fears for his safety.
However, Muturi has remained firm in his stance, asserting that his commitment to his mandate remains unwavering despite the controversies surrounding himself.
His explanation has sparked mixed reactions among the public and political circles. Supporters argue that Muturi’s approach reflects a modernized way of managing responsibilities, especially in an era where technology allows for remote work.
Others, however, view his absence as symbolic of deeper challenges within the government, pointing to the unresolved allegations of abductions and his son’s ordeal as reasons for his cautious behavior.
Muturi’s clarification may ease some concerns, but questions about the larger issues he raised remain unanswered.
